lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 07/15] iommu/vt-d: Delegate the dma domain to upper layer
From
Date
Quoting Lu Baolu (2020-08-24 07:31:23)
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 2020/8/22 2:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Lu Baolu (2019-05-25 06:41:28)
> >> This allows the iommu generic layer to allocate a dma domain and
> >> attach it to a device through the iommu api's. With all types of
> >> domains being delegated to upper layer, we can remove an internal
> >> flag which was used to distinguish domains mananged internally or
> >> externally.
> >
> > I'm seeing some really strange behaviour with this patch on a 32b
> > Skylake system (and still present on mainline). Before this patch
> > everything is peaceful and appears to work correctly. Applying this patch,
> > and we fail to initialise the GPU with a few DMAR errors reported, e.g.
> >
> > [ 20.279445] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 3
> > [ 20.279508] DMAR: [DMA Read] Request device [00:02.0] fault addr 8900a000 [fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set
> >
> > Setting an identity map for the igfx made the DMAR errors disappear, but
> > the GPU still failed to initialise.
> >
> > There's no difference in the DMAR configuration dmesg between working and
> > the upset patch. And the really strange part is that switching to a 64b
> > kernel with this patch, it's working.
> >
> > Any suggestions on what I should look for?
>
> Can the patch titled "[PATCH] iommu/intel: Handle 36b addressing for
> x86-32" solve this problem?

It does. Not sure why, but that mystery I can leave for others.
-Chris

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-24 11:57    [W:0.086 / U:1.548 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site