lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] sched/fair: Fix the logic about active_balance in load_balance()
Date
I think the unbalance scenario here should be that we need to
do active balance but it is not actually done. So fix it.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <arch0.zheng@gmail.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 2ba8f230feb9..6d8c53718b67 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9710,7 +9710,7 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
} else
sd->nr_balance_failed = 0;

- if (likely(!active_balance) || voluntary_active_balance(&env)) {
+ if (likely(!active_balance) && voluntary_active_balance(&env)) {
/* We were unbalanced, so reset the balancing interval */
sd->balance_interval = sd->min_interval;
} else {
--
2.25.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-02 06:53    [W:0.044 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site