lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/8] spi: spi-s3c64xx: Increase transfer timeout
Date
It was <2020-08-19 śro 14:49>, when Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 02:32:07PM +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@samsung.com>
>
> Why? Everything works fine and suddenly minimum timeout is 100 ms?

Actually I am not 100% sure the max() call is required, maybe +30 is
enough. Definitely some minimum value is required because for small
tranfers (100s of bytes) ms is 0 after the first assignment.

>> ---
>> drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
>> index 27d77600a820..27db1e0f6f32 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
>> @@ -464,7 +464,8 @@ static int s3c64xx_wait_for_dma(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd,
>>
>> /* millisecs to xfer 'len' bytes @ 'cur_speed' */
>> ms = xfer->len * 8 * 1000 / sdd->cur_speed;
>> - ms += 10; /* some tolerance */
>> + ms = (ms * 10) + 30; /* some tolerance */
>> + ms = max(ms, 100); /* minimum timeout */
>>
>> val = msecs_to_jiffies(ms) + 10;
>> val = wait_for_completion_timeout(&sdd->xfer_completion, val);
>> --
>> 2.26.2
>>
>
>

--
Łukasz Stelmach
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-19 15:40    [W:0.069 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site