lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/7] pinctrl: qcom: Use return value from irq_set_wake call
From
Date
Hi,

On 8/12/2020 1:04 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Maulik Shah (2020-08-10 04:20:55)
>> msmgpio irqchip is not using return value of irq_set_wake call.
>> Start using it.
> Does this work when the irq parent isn't setup in a hierarchy?
yes it works fine even when parent isn't setup in hierarchy.
> I seem to
> recall that this was written this way because sometimes
> irq_set_irq_wake() would fail for the summary irq so it was a best
> effort setting of wake on the summary line.
Thanks for pointing this.

It was written this way since previously GIC driver neither had
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag nor it implemented .irq_set_wake callback,

so the call to irq_set_irq_wake() to set_irq_wake_real() used to return
error -ENXIO in past.

I see this is already taken care now in GIC drivers by adding
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE flag.

>
>> Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
>> Signed-off-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 8 +++-----
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
>> index 90edf61..c264561 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
>> @@ -1077,12 +1077,10 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
>> * when TLMM is powered on. To allow that, enable the GPIO
>> * summary line to be wakeup capable at GIC.
>> */
>> - if (d->parent_data)
>> - irq_chip_set_wake_parent(d, on);
>> -
>> - irq_set_irq_wake(pctrl->irq, on);
>> + if (d->parent_data && test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs))
>> + return irq_chip_set_wake_parent(d, on);
> So this bit is probably fine.
>
>>
>> - return 0;
>> + return irq_set_irq_wake(pctrl->irq, on);
> But this one is probably not fine.

As per above both of them are fine.

Thanks,
Maulik

>
>> }
>>
>> static int msm_gpio_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-13 09:19    [W:0.240 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site