lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/6] tracing: export event trace and trace_marker
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 12:03:33PM +0800, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:49:46 +0800
> Tingwei Zhang <tingweiz@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:19:54AM +0800, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 11:04:18 +0800
> > > Tingwei Zhang <tingweiz@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for your comments, Steven. I've addressed all your comments
> in
> > > v3.
> > > > Do you have more comments on v3? Is there anything I need to do to
> merge
> > > > this series to Linux Kernel?
> > >
> > > I gave my Reviewed-by tag on each of the patches that touch my tree.
> It
> > > should go in via whoever maintains the drivers/hwtracing tree. Is that
> > > Greg KH?
> > I thought it will go to tracing tree since majority of the changes are
> in
> > kernel/trace.
> >
> > Maintainers of drviers/hwtracing are Mathieu and Suzuki. I'll add them
> > into review list.
> >
>
> As I didn't have reviews or acks from them. I couldn't take the code.
> When touching two subsystems, it usually requires one of the subsystem
> maintainers to ack the changes to their subsystem, so that the other
> subsystem maintainer can take the rest of the code through their tree.
>
> And it usually goes through the tree that has the interface that is
> changing. That is, the changes to tracing was the infrastructure
> needed for the changes in the hwtrace subsystem. And I don't test that
> subsystem, so I wouldn't really be able to test this code.
>
Thanks a lot for detail clarification, Steven.

Thanks,
Tingwei

> -- Steve

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-11 08:46    [W:0.083 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site