lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kunit: added lockdep support
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 04:17:42PM -0500, Uriel Guajardo wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:35 PM Brendan Higgins
> <brendanhiggins@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 1:43 PM Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardo@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:37 PM Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardojr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Uriel Guajardo <urielguajardo@google.com>
> > > >
> > > > KUnit tests will now fail if lockdep detects an error during a test
> > > > case.
> > > >
> > > > The idea comes from how lib/locking-selftest [1] checks for lock errors: we
> > > > first if lock debugging is turned on. If not, an error must have
> > > > occurred, so we fail the test and restart lockdep for the next test case.
> > > >
> > > > Like the locking selftests, we also fix possible preemption count
> > > > corruption from lock bugs.
> >
> > Sorry, just noticed: You probably want to send this to some of the
> > lockdep maintainers or the maintainers of the kselftest for lockdep.
> >
>
> Thanks for the reminder. CC'ed lockdep maintainers.

Please resend as a whole, this is an unreadable mess.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-10 23:26    [W:1.235 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site