lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v19 09/12] arch: Wire up landlock() syscall
From
Date

On 08/07/2020 09:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:10 PM Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net> wrote:
>
>> index f4a01305d9a6..a63a411a74d5 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>> @@ -857,9 +857,11 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_openat2, sys_openat2)
>> __SYSCALL(__NR_pidfd_getfd, sys_pidfd_getfd)
>> #define __NR_faccessat2 439
>> __SYSCALL(__NR_faccessat2, sys_faccessat2)
>> +#define __NR_landlock 440
>> +__SYSCALL(__NR_landlock, sys_landlock)
>>
>> #undef __NR_syscalls
>> -#define __NR_syscalls 440
>> +#define __NR_syscalls 441
>
> In linux-next, we already have:
>
> +#define __NR_watch_mount 440
> +#define __NR_watch_sb 441
> +#define __NR_fsinfo 442
> +#define __NR_process_madvise 443
>
> You may want to increase the number again.
>
> Arnd
>

OK, I'll rebase the next series on linux-next. Do you know if there is
other syscalls on their way to linux-next?

Are the other parts of arch/syscall OK for you?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-08 09:41    [W:0.499 / U:0.632 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site