lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] s390/test_unwind: fix possible memleak in test_unwind()
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 09:35:15AM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-30 at 14:36 +0800, Wang Hai wrote:
> > test_unwind() misses to call kfree(bt) in an error path.
> > Add the missed function call to fix it.
> >
> > Fixes: 0610154650f1 ("s390/test_unwind: print verbose unwinding
> > results")
> > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
> > b/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
> > index 32b7a30b2485..b0b12b46bc57 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/lib/test_unwind.c
> > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ static noinline int test_unwind(struct task_struct
> > *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
> > break;
> > if (state.reliable && !addr) {
> > pr_err("unwind state reliable but addr is
> > 0\n");
> > + kfree(bt);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > sprint_symbol(sym, addr);
>
> Looks good to me, thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>

Applied, thanks!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-31 13:53    [W:0.043 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site