Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Stephan Gerhold <> | Subject | [RFC PATCH 2/3] opp: Set required OPPs in reverse order when scaling down | Date | Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:01:45 +0200 |
| |
The OPP core already has well-defined semantics to ensure required OPPs/regulators are set before/after the frequency change, depending on if we scale up or down.
Similar requirements might exist for the order of required OPPs when multiple power domains need to be scaled for a frequency change.
For example, on Qualcomm platforms using CPR (Core Power Reduction), we need to scale the VDDMX and CPR power domain. When scaling up, MX should be scaled up before CPR. When scaling down, CPR should be scaled down before MX.
In general, if there are multiple "required-opps" in the device tree I would expect that the order is either irrelevant, or there is some dependency between the power domains. In that case, the power domains should be scaled down in reverse order.
This commit updates _set_required_opps() to set required OPPs in reverse order when scaling down.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> --- Related discussion: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20200525194443.GA11851@flawful.org/
The advantage of this approach is that the CPR driver does not need to bother with the VDDMX power domain at all - the requirements can be fully described within the device tree, see e.g. [1]. An alternative option would be to modify the CPR driver to make these votes.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20200507104603.GA581328@gerhold.net/2-msm8916-vdd-mx.patch --- drivers/opp/core.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c index f7a476b55069..f93f551c911e 100644 --- a/drivers/opp/core.c +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c @@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ static int _set_required_opp(struct device *dev, struct device *pd_dev, /* This is only called for PM domain for now */ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev, struct opp_table *opp_table, - struct dev_pm_opp *opp) + struct dev_pm_opp *opp, bool up) { struct opp_table **required_opp_tables = opp_table->required_opp_tables; struct device **genpd_virt_devs = opp_table->genpd_virt_devs; @@ -821,12 +821,24 @@ static int _set_required_opps(struct device *dev, */ mutex_lock(&opp_table->genpd_virt_dev_lock); - for (i = 0; i < opp_table->required_opp_count; i++) { - pd_dev = genpd_virt_devs[i]; + if (up) { + /* Scaling up? Set required OPPs in normal order */ + for (i = 0; i < opp_table->required_opp_count; i++) { + pd_dev = genpd_virt_devs[i]; - ret = _set_required_opp(dev, pd_dev, opp, i); - if (ret) - break; + ret = _set_required_opp(dev, pd_dev, opp, i); + if (ret) + break; + } + } else { + /* Scaling down? Set required OPPs in reverse order */ + for (i = opp_table->required_opp_count - 1; i >= 0; i--) { + pd_dev = genpd_virt_devs[i]; + + ret = _set_required_opp(dev, pd_dev, opp, i); + if (ret) + break; + } } mutex_unlock(&opp_table->genpd_virt_dev_lock); @@ -914,7 +926,7 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq) opp_table->regulator_enabled = false; } - ret = _set_required_opps(dev, opp_table, NULL); + ret = _set_required_opps(dev, opp_table, NULL, false); goto put_opp_table; } @@ -973,7 +985,7 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq) /* Scaling up? Configure required OPPs before frequency */ if (freq >= old_freq) { - ret = _set_required_opps(dev, opp_table, opp); + ret = _set_required_opps(dev, opp_table, opp, true); if (ret) goto put_opp; } @@ -993,7 +1005,7 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq) /* Scaling down? Configure required OPPs after frequency */ if (!ret && freq < old_freq) { - ret = _set_required_opps(dev, opp_table, opp); + ret = _set_required_opps(dev, opp_table, opp, false); if (ret) dev_err(dev, "Failed to set required opps: %d\n", ret); } -- 2.27.0
| |