lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] fsi/sbefifo: Clean up correct FIFO when receiving reset request from SBE
From
Date
On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 16:45 +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
> From: Joachim Fenkes <FENKES@de.ibm.com>
>
> When the SBE requests a reset via the down FIFO, that is also the
> FIFO we should go and reset ;)

Is it ?

I no longer work for IBM and dont have access to any of the
documentation here but I had vague memories that we would get a reset
request in the down fifo in order to reset the up one since we control
the up one and the host controls the down one, no ?

Cheers,
Ben.

> Fixes: 9f4a8a2d7f9d ("fsi/sbefifo: Add driver for the SBE FIFO")
> Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes <FENKES@de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
> ---
> drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
> index f54df9ebc8b3..655b45c1f6ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
> +++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-sbefifo.c
> @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ static int sbefifo_cleanup_hw(struct sbefifo
> *sbefifo)
> /* The FIFO already contains a reset request from the SBE ? */
> if (down_status & SBEFIFO_STS_RESET_REQ) {
> dev_info(dev, "Cleanup: FIFO reset request set,
> resetting\n");
> - rc = sbefifo_regw(sbefifo, SBEFIFO_UP,
> SBEFIFO_PERFORM_RESET);
> + rc = sbefifo_regw(sbefifo, SBEFIFO_DOWN,
> SBEFIFO_PERFORM_RESET);
> if (rc) {
> sbefifo->broken = true;
> dev_err(dev, "Cleanup: Reset reg write failed,
> rc=%d\n", rc);

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-27 07:51    [W:0.071 / U:0.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site