Messages in this thread | | | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] entry: Fix CONFIG_SECCOMP assumption | Date | Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:39:41 +0200 |
| |
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> writes: > * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > >> Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> writes: >> > The __secure_computing() callback only exists on CONFIG_SECCOMP=y, >> >> No. There is a stub function for the SECCOMP=n case. > > Which was buggy: > > static inline int __secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
Yes. I screwed that up and fixing that is the right thing to do.
| |