lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Fix term parsing for raw syntax
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:58:13AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:

SNIP

> > ret = parse_events_terms(&terms, t->str);
> > if (ret) {
> > pr_debug("failed to parse terms '%s', err %d\n",
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> > index e88e4c7a2a9a..254f02a7fb0d 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> > @@ -2019,6 +2019,27 @@ static void perf_pmu__parse_init(void)
> > perf_pmu__parse_cleanup();
> > }
> >
> > +int perf_pmu__test_parse_init(void)
> > +{
> > + struct perf_pmu_event_symbol *list;
> > +
> > + list = malloc(sizeof(*list) * 1);
> > + if (!list)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + list->type = PMU_EVENT_SYMBOL;
> > + list->symbol = strdup("read");
> > +
> > + if (!list->symbol) {
> > + free(list);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + perf_pmu_events_list = list;
> > + perf_pmu_events_list_num = 1;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> nit: It's easy to see in the test code why this is necessary, could
> the function be moved there? If not perhaps add a function comment?
> The test in the function name is quite load bearing.

both perf_pmu_events_list/cnt are static and I'd like to keep it that
way, so the function needs to be in here.. I'll add comment explaining
this

jirka

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-26 09:48    [W:0.088 / U:0.612 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site