lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v4 01/14] i2c: tegra: Don't mark VI I2C as IRQ safe runtime PM
From
Date
24.07.2020 02:50, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
> Tegra VI I2C is part of VE power domain and typically used for
> camera usecases.
>
> VE power domain is not always on and is non-IRQ safe. So, IRQ safe
> device cannot be attached to a non-IRQ safe domain as it prevents
> powering off the PM domain and generic power domain driver will warn.
>
> Current driver marks all I2C devices as IRQ safe and VI I2C device
> does not require IRQ safe as it will not be used for atomic transfers.
>
> This patch has fix to make VI I2C as non-IRQ safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> index 1577296..3be1018 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> @@ -1750,7 +1750,15 @@ static int tegra_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto unprepare_slow_clk;
> }
>
> - pm_runtime_irq_safe(&pdev->dev);
> + /*
> + * VI I2C is in VE power domain which is not always on and not
> + * an IRQ safe. So, IRQ safe device can't be attached to a non-IRQ
> + * safe domain as it prevents powering off the PM domain.
> + * Also, VI I2C device don't need to use runtime IRQ safe as it will
> + * not be used for atomic transfers.
> + */
> + if (!i2c_dev->is_vi)
> + pm_runtime_irq_safe(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&pdev->dev)) {
> ret = tegra_i2c_runtime_resume(&pdev->dev);
>

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-27 01:31    [W:0.583 / U:0.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site