lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v16 6/9] nvmet-passthru: Add passthru code to process commands


On 2020-07-24 1:33 p.m., Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:25:17AM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> + /*
>> + * The passthru NVMe driver may have a limit on the number of segments
>> + * which depends on the host's memory fragementation. To solve this,
>> + * ensure mdts is limitted to the pages equal to the number of
>
> limited
>
>> + /* don't support fuse commands */
>> + id->fuses = 0;
>
> If a host were to set a fuse, the target should return an Invalid Field
> error. Just to future-proof, rejecting commands with any flags set
> (other than SGL, which you handled in patch 1/9) is probably what should
> happen, like:

>
>> +u16 nvmet_parse_passthru_io_cmd(struct nvmet_req *req)
>> +{
>
> if (req->cmd->common.flags & ~NVME_CMD_SGL_ALL)
> return NVME_SC_INVALID_FIELD;


Yes, this seems like a good idea. I can add it.

> Or maybe we could obviate the need for 1/9 with something like:
>
> req->cmd->common.flags &= ~NVME_CMD_SGL_ALL;
> if (req->cmd->common.flags)
> return NVME_SC_INVALID_FIELD;

We used to clear the SGL flags in the target passthru code but Christoph
asked that it be done in the host code, hence patch 1/9.

Logan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-24 21:41    [W:0.053 / U:3.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site