| From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] x86: support i386 with Clang | Date | Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:14:41 +0200 |
| |
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> writes:
I'm glad I looked myself at this.
> We also don't want to swap the use of "=q" with "=r". For 64b, it > doesn't matter. For 32b, it's possible that a 32b register without a 8b > lower alias (i.e. ESI, EDI, EBP) is selected which the assembler will > then reject.
The above is really garbage.
We don't want? It's simply not possible to do so, because ...
64b,32b,8b. For heavens sake is it too much asked to write a changelog with understandable wording instead of ambiguous abbreviations?
There is no maximum character limit for changelogs.
Thanks,
tglx
|