lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 11/11] x86: support i386 with Clang
Date
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> writes:

I'm glad I looked myself at this.

> We also don't want to swap the use of "=q" with "=r". For 64b, it
> doesn't matter. For 32b, it's possible that a 32b register without a 8b
> lower alias (i.e. ESI, EDI, EBP) is selected which the assembler will
> then reject.

The above is really garbage.

We don't want? It's simply not possible to do so, because ...

64b,32b,8b. For heavens sake is it too much asked to write a changelog
with understandable wording instead of ambiguous abbreviations?

There is no maximum character limit for changelogs.

Thanks,

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-23 11:15    [W:0.136 / U:0.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site