Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:10:46 -0700 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/6] syscalls: use uaccess_kernel in addr_limit_user_check |
| |
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 11:48:46AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 06:38:50PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:55:00PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Use the uaccess_kernel helper instead of duplicating it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > > > This patch causes a severe hiccup with my mps2-an385 boot test. >
I had another look into the code. Right after this patch, I see
#define uaccess_kernel() segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS)
Yet, this patch is:
- if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(!segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS), + if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(uaccess_kernel(),
So there is a negation in the condition. Indeed, the following change on top of next-20200720 fixes the problem for mps2-an385.
- if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(uaccess_kernel(), + if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(!uaccess_kernel(),
How does this work anywhere ?
Thanks, Guenter
> I guess that is a nommu config? > > Can you try this patch? > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h > index b19c9bec1f7a63..cc7daf374a6eb6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h > @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ extern int __put_user_8(void *, unsigned long long); > */ > #define USER_DS KERNEL_DS > > -#define uaccess_kernel() (true) > +#define uaccess_kernel() (false) > #define __addr_ok(addr) ((void)(addr), 1) > #define __range_ok(addr, size) ((void)(addr), 0) > #define get_fs() (KERNEL_DS)
| |