lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH V4 5/5] clk: imx8qxp: Support building i.MX8QXP clock driver as module
Date


> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/5] clk: imx8qxp: Support building i.MX8QXP clock
> driver as module
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:55 AM Anson Huang <anson.huang@nxp.com>
> wrote:
> [...]
> > > > +{
> > > > + return platform_driver_register(&imx8qxp_lpcg_clk_driver);
> > > > +}
> > > > +device_initcall(imx8qxp_lpcg_clk_init);
> > >
> > > Any reason to change to device_initcall which looks a bit strange?
> > > Is it because the following line?
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_MXC_CLK_SCU) += clk-imx-scu.o clk-imx-lpcg-scu.o
> > > But it looks to me they're still two modules. Aren't they?
> >
> > It is suggested by Arnd to NOT use builtin_platform_driver(), in order
> > to support module unload, although the clock driver normally does NOT
> > support remove, but it is better to follow the right way.
> >
>
> By expanding builtin_platform_driver() marcro, you will find your patch is
> exactly doing the same thing as buildin_platform_driver() which obivously is
> unneccesary.
>
> #define builtin_platform_driver(__platform_driver) \
> builtin_driver(__platform_driver, platform_driver_register) #define
> builtin_driver(__driver, __register, ...) \
>
> static int __init __driver##_init(void) \ { \
> return __register(&(__driver) , ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } \
> device_initcall(__driver##_init);
>
> If we want to support unload, we need a .remove() callback as current clocks
> are not allocated by devm_().
> If don't support, we probably can use builtin_platform_driver() first and
> switch to module_platform_driver() in the future once the driver supports
> release resource properly.
>

Yes, that is why I use the device_initcall() to make it exactly same as builtin_driver(),
and also yes that i.MX clock driver does NOT support module unload, so .remove()
is NOT implemented, I am fine with either way, just try to address Arnd's comment.

Hi, Arnd
What do you think? Do you agree to keep using the builtin_driver()?

Thanks,
Anson
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-02 07:51    [W:0.389 / U:1.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site