lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[GIT pull] sched/urgent for v5.8-rc6
Linus,

please pull the latest sched/urgent branch from:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched-urgent-2020-07-19

up to: 01cfcde9c26d: sched/fair: handle case of task_h_load() returning 0

A set of scheduler fixes:

- Plug a load average accounting race which was introduced with a recent
optimization casing load average to show bogus numbers.

- Fix the rseq CPU id initialization for new tasks. sched_fork() does not
update the rseq CPU id so the id is the stale id of the parent task,
which can cause user space data corruption.

- Handle a 0 return value of task_h_load() correctly in the load balancer,
which does not decrease imbalance and therefore pulls until the maximum
number of loops is reached, which might be all tasks just created by a
fork bomb.

Thanks,

tglx

------------------>
Mathieu Desnoyers (1):
sched: Fix unreliable rseq cpu_id for new tasks

Peter Zijlstra (1):
sched: Fix loadavg accounting race

Vincent Guittot (1):
sched/fair: handle case of task_h_load() returning 0


include/linux/sched.h | 4 ---
kernel/sched/core.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
kernel/sched/fair.c | 15 +++++++++--
3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 692e327d7455..683372943093 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -114,10 +114,6 @@ struct task_group;

#define task_is_stopped_or_traced(task) ((task->state & (__TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED)) != 0)

-#define task_contributes_to_load(task) ((task->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) != 0 && \
- (task->flags & PF_FROZEN) == 0 && \
- (task->state & TASK_NOLOAD) == 0)
-
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP

/*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index ca5db40392d4..e15543cb8481 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1311,9 +1311,6 @@ static inline void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)

void activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
- if (task_contributes_to_load(p))
- rq->nr_uninterruptible--;
-
enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);

p->on_rq = TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED;
@@ -1323,9 +1320,6 @@ void deactivate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
{
p->on_rq = (flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP) ? 0 : TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING;

- if (task_contributes_to_load(p))
- rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
-
dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
}

@@ -2236,10 +2230,10 @@ ttwu_do_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags,

lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);

-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (p->sched_contributes_to_load)
rq->nr_uninterruptible--;

+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (wake_flags & WF_MIGRATED)
en_flags |= ENQUEUE_MIGRATED;
#endif
@@ -2583,7 +2577,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
* A similar smb_rmb() lives in try_invoke_on_locked_down_task().
*/
smp_rmb();
- if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
+ if (READ_ONCE(p->on_rq) && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
goto unlock;

if (p->in_iowait) {
@@ -2592,9 +2586,6 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
}

#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- p->sched_contributes_to_load = !!task_contributes_to_load(p);
- p->state = TASK_WAKING;
-
/*
* Ensure we load p->on_cpu _after_ p->on_rq, otherwise it would be
* possible to, falsely, observe p->on_cpu == 0.
@@ -2613,8 +2604,20 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
*
* Pairs with the LOCK+smp_mb__after_spinlock() on rq->lock in
* __schedule(). See the comment for smp_mb__after_spinlock().
+ *
+ * Form a control-dep-acquire with p->on_rq == 0 above, to ensure
+ * schedule()'s deactivate_task() has 'happened' and p will no longer
+ * care about it's own p->state. See the comment in __schedule().
*/
- smp_rmb();
+ smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
+
+ /*
+ * We're doing the wakeup (@success == 1), they did a dequeue (p->on_rq
+ * == 0), which means we need to do an enqueue, change p->state to
+ * TASK_WAKING such that we can unlock p->pi_lock before doing the
+ * enqueue, such as ttwu_queue_wakelist().
+ */
+ p->state = TASK_WAKING;

/*
* If the owning (remote) CPU is still in the middle of schedule() with
@@ -2962,6 +2965,7 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
* Silence PROVE_RCU.
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+ rseq_migrate(p);
/*
* We're setting the CPU for the first time, we don't migrate,
* so use __set_task_cpu().
@@ -3026,6 +3030,7 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p)
* as we're not fully set-up yet.
*/
p->recent_used_cpu = task_cpu(p);
+ rseq_migrate(p);
__set_task_cpu(p, select_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p), SD_BALANCE_FORK, 0));
#endif
rq = __task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
@@ -4097,6 +4102,7 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
{
struct task_struct *prev, *next;
unsigned long *switch_count;
+ unsigned long prev_state;
struct rq_flags rf;
struct rq *rq;
int cpu;
@@ -4113,12 +4119,22 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
local_irq_disable();
rcu_note_context_switch(preempt);

+ /* See deactivate_task() below. */
+ prev_state = prev->state;
+
/*
* Make sure that signal_pending_state()->signal_pending() below
* can't be reordered with __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
- * done by the caller to avoid the race with signal_wake_up().
+ * done by the caller to avoid the race with signal_wake_up():
+ *
+ * __set_current_state(@state) signal_wake_up()
+ * schedule() set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_SIGPENDING)
+ * wake_up_state(p, state)
+ * LOCK rq->lock LOCK p->pi_state
+ * smp_mb__after_spinlock() smp_mb__after_spinlock()
+ * if (signal_pending_state()) if (p->state & @state)
*
- * The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier
+ * Also, the membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier
* after coming from user-space, before storing to rq->curr.
*/
rq_lock(rq, &rf);
@@ -4129,10 +4145,31 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
update_rq_clock(rq);

switch_count = &prev->nivcsw;
- if (!preempt && prev->state) {
- if (signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev)) {
+ /*
+ * We must re-load prev->state in case ttwu_remote() changed it
+ * before we acquired rq->lock.
+ */
+ if (!preempt && prev_state && prev_state == prev->state) {
+ if (signal_pending_state(prev_state, prev)) {
prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
} else {
+ prev->sched_contributes_to_load =
+ (prev_state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) &&
+ !(prev_state & TASK_NOLOAD) &&
+ !(prev->flags & PF_FROZEN);
+
+ if (prev->sched_contributes_to_load)
+ rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
+
+ /*
+ * __schedule() ttwu()
+ * prev_state = prev->state; if (READ_ONCE(p->on_rq) && ...)
+ * LOCK rq->lock goto out;
+ * smp_mb__after_spinlock(); smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
+ * p->on_rq = 0; p->state = TASK_WAKING;
+ *
+ * After this, schedule() must not care about p->state any more.
+ */
deactivate_task(rq, prev, DEQUEUE_SLEEP | DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK);

if (prev->in_iowait) {
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 658aa7a2ae6f..04fa8dbcfa4d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4039,7 +4039,11 @@ static inline void update_misfit_status(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
return;
}

- rq->misfit_task_load = task_h_load(p);
+ /*
+ * Make sure that misfit_task_load will not be null even if
+ * task_h_load() returns 0.
+ */
+ rq->misfit_task_load = max_t(unsigned long, task_h_load(p), 1);
}

#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
@@ -7638,7 +7642,14 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)

switch (env->migration_type) {
case migrate_load:
- load = task_h_load(p);
+ /*
+ * Depending of the number of CPUs and tasks and the
+ * cgroup hierarchy, task_h_load() can return a null
+ * value. Make sure that env->imbalance decreases
+ * otherwise detach_tasks() will stop only after
+ * detaching up to loop_max tasks.
+ */
+ load = max_t(unsigned long, task_h_load(p), 1);

if (sched_feat(LB_MIN) &&
load < 16 && !env->sd->nr_balance_failed)
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-19 15:20    [W:0.065 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site