lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Linux FSGSBASE testing
From
Date
On 6/20/20 11:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi Stas-
>
> FSGSBASE support is queued up for Linux 5.9. Since you're one of the
> more exotic users of segmentation on Linux, is there any chance you
> could test it? The code is here:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/log/?h=x86/fsgsbase
>
> There are two interesting cases to test:
>
> 1. FSGSBASE on. This is the default if you boot this kernel on Ivy
> Bridge or newer hardware.
>
> 2. FSGSBASE off on a patched kernel. Boot the same kernel as in #1
> but either pass nofsgsbase on the kernel command line or use pre-Ivy
> Bridge hardware. You will *
>
> You can tell you have FSGSBASE enabled for test #1 by running
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase_64 -- the first line of output
> will be :FSGSBASE instructions are enabled". You can build it by
> cd-ing to tools/testing/selftests/x86 and running make.
>
> If anything is broken for you, I'd like to know before this makes it
> into a released kernel!
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>

FWIW, we tested this patch using Graphene under Case 1, both in our
standard CI pipelines, and with hand testing. Everything looks good on
our end - no suspicious dmesg, no application-level issues.

I also reran the stress test Andy suggested on a separate thread, which
also looks good:
* Graphene running nginx pinned to core 0
* infinite loop on core 0
* perf top running
* Exercised with non-SGX apache bench several times (~10 minutes of
testing time) also from core 0

All the best,
Don

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-18 22:19    [W:0.050 / U:0.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site