lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] task_put batching
From
Date
On 7/18/20 2:32 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> For my a bit exaggerated test case perf continues to show high CPU
> cosumption by io_dismantle(), and so calling it io_iopoll_complete().
> Even though the patch doesn't yield throughput increase for my setup,
> probably because the effect is hidden behind polling, but it definitely
> improves relative percentage. And the difference should only grow with
> increasing number of CPUs. Another reason to have this is that atomics
> may affect other parallel tasks (e.g. which doesn't use io_uring)
>
> before:
> io_iopoll_complete: 5.29%
> io_dismantle_req: 2.16%
>
> after:
> io_iopoll_complete: 3.39%
> io_dismantle_req: 0.465%

Still not seeing a win here, but it's clean and it _should_ work. For
some reason I end up getting the offset in task ref put growing the
fput_many(). Which doesn't (on the surface) make a lot of sense, but
may just mean that we have some weird side effects.

I have applied it, thanks.

--
Jens Axboe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-18 16:37    [W:0.198 / U:0.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site