Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update CascadelakeX and SkylakeX events list | From | "Jin, Yao" <> | Date | Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:06:51 +0800 |
| |
Hi,
On 6/17/2020 3:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu: >> On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>>> Can I get an ACK for this patchset? >>>> On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote: >>>>> This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and >>>>> updates SkylakeX events to v1.21. > >>>>> The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX >>>>> servers with latest perf/core branch. > >>> could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree? >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core >>> I tried using git am but get: >>> Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 >>> error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14 @@ >>> error: could not build fake ancestor >>> Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ian >>> >> >> The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch. >> >> As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on perf/core branch, is it right? > > Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more > quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly > both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding edge > is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to > rebase it like before. > > - Arnaldo >
Can this event update be accepted?
Thanks Jin Yao
| |