lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Revert "test_bpf: flag tests that cannot be jited on s390"
From
Date
On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 09:39 -0500, Seth Forshee wrote:
> This reverts commit 3203c9010060806ff88c9989aeab4dc8d9a474dc.
>
> The s390 bpf JIT previously had a restriction on the maximum
> program size, which required some tests in test_bpf to be flagged
> as expected failures. The program size limitation has been removed,
> and the tests now pass, so these tests should no longer be flagged.
>
> Fixes: d1242b10ff03 ("s390/bpf: Remove JITed image size limitations")
> Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
> ---
> lib/test_bpf.c | 20 --------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
> index a5fddf9ebcb7..ca7d635bccd9 100644
> --- a/lib/test_bpf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
> @@ -5275,31 +5275,21 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
> { /* Mainly checking JIT here. */
> "BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations",
> { },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> - CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
> CLASSIC,
> -#endif
> { },
> {
> { 1, SKB_VLAN_PRESENT },
> { 10, SKB_VLAN_PRESENT }
> },
> .fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns6,
> - .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
> },
> { /* Mainly checking JIT here. */
> "BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations",
> { },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> - CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
> CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
> -#endif
> { },
> { { 1, 0 }, { 10, 0 } },
> .fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns7,
> - .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
> },
> { /* Mainly checking JIT here. */
> "BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test",
> @@ -5350,28 +5340,18 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
> {
> "BPF_MAXINSNS: exec all MSH",
> { },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> - CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
> CLASSIC,
> -#endif
> { 0xfa, 0xfb, 0xfc, 0xfd, },
> { { 4, 0xababab83 } },
> .fill_helper = bpf_fill_maxinsns13,
> - .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
> },
> {
> "BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id",
> { },
> -#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) && defined(CONFIG_S390)
> - CLASSIC | FLAG_EXPECTED_FAIL,
> -#else
> CLASSIC,
> -#endif
> { },
> { { 1, 0xbee } },
> .fill_helper = bpf_fill_ld_abs_get_processor_id,
> - .expected_errcode = -ENOTSUPP,
> },
> /*
> * LD_IND / LD_ABS on fragmented SKBs

Thank you for the fix!
I tested it and it indeed fixes these 4 failures.

I will have a look at the remaining 8 tomorrow.

Reviewed-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-16 19:55    [W:0.064 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site