Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:13:38 +0100 | From | Lee Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Functions only used in call-backs should be static |
| |
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15-07-20, 09:26, Lee Jones wrote: > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): > > > > drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:669:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘gpstate_timer_handler’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:902:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘powernv_cpufreq_work_fn’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > > > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> > > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> > > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c > > index 8646eb197cd96..068cc53abe320 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c > > @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static inline void queue_gpstate_timer(struct global_pstate_info *gpstates) > > * according quadratic equation. Queues a new timer if it is still not equal > > * to local pstate > > */ > > -void gpstate_timer_handler(struct timer_list *t) > > +static void gpstate_timer_handler(struct timer_list *t) > > { > > struct global_pstate_info *gpstates = from_timer(gpstates, t, timer); > > struct cpufreq_policy *policy = gpstates->policy; > > @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = { > > .notifier_call = powernv_cpufreq_reboot_notifier, > > }; > > > > -void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) > > +static void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) > > { > > struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle); > > struct cpufreq_policy *policy; > > Don't you want to drop this patch now ? As you already reviewed the > other one on the list ?
Yes, please drop/ignore.
-- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
| |