lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: thp: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones
From
Date
On 7/13/20 6:43 PM, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
> Rationale:
> Reduces attack surface on kernel devs opening the links for MITM
> as HTTPS traffic is much harder to manipulate.
>
> Deterministic algorithm:
> For each file:
> If not .svg:
> For each line:
> If doesn't contain `\bxmlns\b`:
> For each link, `\bhttp://[^# \t\r\n]*(?:\w|/)`:
> If neither `\bgnu\.org/license`, nor `\bmozilla\.org/MPL\b`:
> If both the HTTP and HTTPS versions
> return 200 OK and serve the same content:
> Replace HTTP with HTTPS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander A. Klimov <grandmaster@al2klimov.de>
> ---
> Continuing my work started at 93431e0607e5.
> See also: git log --oneline '--author=Alexander A. Klimov <grandmaster@al2klimov.de>' v5.7..master
> (Actually letting a shell for loop submit all this stuff for me.)
>
> If there are any URLs to be removed completely or at least not just HTTPSified:
> Just clearly say so and I'll *undo my change*.
> See also: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/27/64
>
> If there are any valid, but yet not changed URLs:
> See: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/26/837
>
> If you apply the patch, please let me know.
>
> Sorry again to all maintainers who complained about subject lines.
> Now I realized that you want an actually perfect prefixes,
> not just subsystem ones.
> I tried my best...
> And yes, *I could* (at least half-)automate it.
> Impossible is nothing! :)
>
>
> mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 78c84bee7e29..9e4b78cf73ab 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2069,7 +2069,7 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> * free), userland could trigger a small page size TLB miss on the
> * small sized TLB while the hugepage TLB entry is still established in
> * the huge TLB. Some CPU doesn't like that.
> - * See http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/41322.pdf, Erratum
> + * See https://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/41322.pdf, Erratum
> * 383 on page 93. Intel should be safe but is also warns that it's

Well, it was a good opportunity to find out that the link doesn't work anyway.
The pdf seems to be now at
http://support.amd.com/TechDocs/41322_10h_Rev_Gd.pdf
and the erratum is on page 105

> * only safe if the permission and cache attributes of the two entries
> * loaded in the two TLB is identical (which should be the case here).
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-14 11:42    [W:0.066 / U:4.948 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site