Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC v2 1/5] perf/pmu-events/jevents: Add enum to store aggregation like PerPkg | From | kajoljain <> | Date | Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:39:20 +0530 |
| |
On 7/13/20 12:25 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 05:53:10PM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote: > > SNIP > >> } >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c >> index 93fe72a9dc0b..3cafbb320d68 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c >> @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static bool perf_pmu_merge_alias(struct perf_pmu_alias *newalias, >> static int __perf_pmu__new_alias(struct list_head *list, char *dir, char *name, >> char *desc, char *val, >> char *long_desc, char *topic, >> - char *unit, char *perpkg, >> + char *unit, char *aggr_mode, >> char *metric_expr, >> char *metric_name, >> char *deprecated) >> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int __perf_pmu__new_alias(struct list_head *list, char *dir, char *name, >> return -1; >> snprintf(alias->unit, sizeof(alias->unit), "%s", unit); >> } >> - alias->per_pkg = perpkg && sscanf(perpkg, "%d", &num) == 1 && num == 1; >> + alias->per_pkg = aggr_mode && sscanf(aggr_mode, "%d", &num) == 1 && num == 1; > > should you rather use 'num == PerPkg' instead 'num == 1' ?
Hi Jiri, Thanks for reviewing the patchset. Sure I will update it.
Thanks, Kajol Jain > > jirka >
| |