lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/5] vfio/pci: add qat devices to blocklist
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:10:34AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:44:33 -0500
> Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:37:45AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 04:08:19PM +0100, Giovanni Cabiddu wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 04:28:12PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 12:03:00PM +0100, Giovanni Cabiddu wrote:
> > > > > > The current generation of Intel® QuickAssist Technology devices
> > > > > > are not designed to run in an untrusted environment because of the
> > > > > > following issues reported in the release notes in
> > > > > > https://01.org/intel-quickassist-technology:
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be nice if this link were directly clickable, e.g., if there
> > > > > were no trailing ":" or something.
> > > > >
> > > > > And it would be even better if it went to a specific doc that
> > > > > described these issues. I assume these are errata, and it's not easy
> > > > > to figure out which doc mentions them.
> > > > Sure. I will fix the commit message in the next revision and point to the
> > > > actual document:
> > > > https://01.org/sites/default/files/downloads/336211-015-qatsoftwareforlinux-rn-hwv1.7-final.pdf
> > >
> > > Since URLs tend to go stale, please also include the Intel document
> > > number and title.
> >
> > Oh, and is "01.org" really the right place for that? It looks like an
> > Intel document, so I'd expect it to be somewhere on intel.com.
> >
> > I'm still a little confused. That doc seems to be about *software*
> > and Linux software in particular. But when you said these "devices
> > are not designed to run in an untrusted environment", I thought you
> > meant there was some *hardware* design issue that caused a problem.
Yes, the problem is in hardware.

> There seems to be a fair bit of hardware errata in the doc too, see:
>
> 3.1.2 QATE-7495 - GEN - An incorrectly formatted request to Intel® QAT can
> hang the entire Intel® QAT Endpoint
>
> 3.1.9 QATE-39220 - GEN - QAT API submissions with bad addresses that
> trigger DMA to invalid or unmapped addresses can cause a platform
> hang
>
> 3.1.17 QATE-52389 - SR-IOV -Huge pages may not be compatible with QAT
> VF usage
>
> 3.1.19 QATE-60953 - GEN – Intel® QAT API submissions with bad addresses
> that trigger DMA to invalid or unmapped addresses can impact QAT
> service availability
Correct, that document contains errata for both the QAT HW and the
current software.

Regards,

--
Giovanni

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-10 18:23    [W:1.167 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site