Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Use 18-bit DP if we can | From | Steev Klimaszewski <> | Date | Fri, 10 Jul 2020 01:15:28 -0500 |
| |
Hi,
On 7/9/20 11:12 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: >> root@c630:~# bus=$(i2cdetect -l | grep sn65 | sed 's/i2c-\([0-9]*\).*$/\1/') >> root@c630:~# i2cdump ${bus} 0x50 i > edid >> WARNING! This program can confuse your I2C bus, cause data loss and worse! >> I will probe file /dev/i2c-16, address 0x50, mode i2c block >> Continue? [Y/n] >> root@c630:~# edid-decode edid >> edid-decode (hex): >> >> 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 09 e5 d1 07 00 00 00 00 >> 01 1c 01 04 a5 1d 11 78 0a 1d b0 a6 58 54 9e 26 >> 0f 50 54 00 00 00 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 >> 01 01 01 01 01 01 c0 39 80 18 71 38 28 40 30 20 >> 36 00 26 a5 10 00 00 1a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1a 00 00 00 fe 00 42 >> 4f 45 20 43 51 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 00 00 00 fe >> 00 4e 56 31 33 33 46 48 4d 2d 4e 36 31 0a 00 9a >> >> 03 26 0a 77 ab 1c 05 71 6f 1d 8c f1 43 ce 6a bb >> fb d3 11 20 39 07 22 6e 65 68 77 70 d3 05 34 73 >> 44 21 8b fd f5 6d 11 62 94 2a 7c fa 93 ba 6a 61 >> 92 da 15 53 4c 39 eb f7 86 23 97 48 e9 39 09 d2 >> 66 02 70 bb e2 77 0f 4a a3 a0 4c 72 6e 5d 47 70 >> 43 c2 13 f3 b2 d9 b9 78 02 be 41 82 15 6a 28 dc >> 45 0f 9d eb 0f 2a cc e8 35 8d 34 7f 3e 84 5e a3 >> 30 5e 1e 29 0a 48 0c d1 0a c4 08 31 03 a9 3b 29 >> >> ---------------- >> >> EDID version: 1.4 >> Manufacturer: BOE Model 2001 Serial Number 0 >> Made in week 1 of 2018 >> Digital display >> 8 bits per primary color channel >> DisplayPort interface >> Maximum image size: 29 cm x 17 cm >> Gamma: 2.20 >> Supported color formats: RGB 4:4:4, YCrCb 4:4:4 >> First detailed timing includes the native pixel format and preferred >> refresh rate >> Color Characteristics >> Red: 0.6484, 0.3447 >> Green: 0.3310, 0.6181 >> Blue: 0.1503, 0.0615 >> White: 0.3125, 0.3281 >> Established Timings I & II: none >> Standard Timings: none >> Detailed mode: Clock 147.840 MHz, 294 mm x 165 mm >> 1920 1968 2000 2200 ( 48 32 200) >> 1080 1083 1089 1120 ( 3 6 31) >> +hsync -vsync >> VertFreq: 60.000 Hz, HorFreq: 67.200 kHz >> Manufacturer-Specified Display Descriptor (0x00): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1a ................ >> Alphanumeric Data String: BOE CQ >> Alphanumeric Data String: NV133FHM-N61 >> Checksum: 0x9a >> >> ---------------- >> >> Unknown EDID Extension Block 0x03 >> 03 26 0a 77 ab 1c 05 71 6f 1d 8c f1 43 ce 6a bb .&.w...qo...C.j. >> fb d3 11 20 39 07 22 6e 65 68 77 70 d3 05 34 73 ... 9."nehwp..4s >> 44 21 8b fd f5 6d 11 62 94 2a 7c fa 93 ba 6a 61 D!...m.b.*|...ja >> 92 da 15 53 4c 39 eb f7 86 23 97 48 e9 39 09 d2 ...SL9...#.H.9.. >> 66 02 70 bb e2 77 0f 4a a3 a0 4c 72 6e 5d 47 70 f.p..w.J..Lrn]Gp >> 43 c2 13 f3 b2 d9 b9 78 02 be 41 82 15 6a 28 dc C......x..A..j(. >> 45 0f 9d eb 0f 2a cc e8 35 8d 34 7f 3e 84 5e a3 E....*..5.4.>.^. >> 30 5e 1e 29 0a 48 0c d1 0a c4 08 31 03 a9 3b 29 0^.).H.....1..;) >> Checksum: 0x29 (should be 0x82) >> >> >> - My edid does in fact say it's 8bit > Crazy! Mine: > > Extracted contents: > header: 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 > serial number: 09 e5 2d 08 00 00 00 00 23 1c > version: 01 04 > basic params: 95 1d 11 78 02 > chroma info: d5 00 a6 58 54 9f 27 0f 4f 57 > established: 00 00 00 > standard: 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 > descriptor 1: c0 39 80 18 71 38 28 40 30 20 36 00 26 a5 10 00 00 1a > descriptor 2: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > descriptor 3: 00 00 00 fe 00 42 4f 45 20 43 51 0a 20 20 20 20 20 20 > descriptor 4: 00 00 00 fe 00 4e 56 31 33 33 46 48 4d 2d 4e 36 32 0a > extensions: 00 > checksum: 40 > > Manufacturer: BOE Model 82d Serial Number 0 > Made week 35 of 2018 > EDID version: 1.4 > Digital display > 6 bits per primary color channel > DisplayPort interface > Maximum image size: 29 cm x 17 cm > Gamma: 2.20 > Supported color formats: RGB 4:4:4 > First detailed timing is preferred timing > Established timings supported: > Standard timings supported: > Detailed mode: Clock 147.840 MHz, 294 mm x 165 mm > 1920 1968 2000 2200 hborder 0 > 1080 1083 1089 1120 vborder 0 > +hsync -vsync > Manufacturer-specified data, tag 0 > ASCII string: BOE > ASCII string: NV133FHM-N62 > Checksum: 0x40 (valid) > > Unknown extension block > > EDID block does NOT conform to EDID 1.3! > Missing name descriptor > Missing monitor ranges > Detailed block string not properly terminated > EDID block does not conform at all! > Has 128 nonconformant extension block(s)
I did attempt to modify the patch, and I don't think I did it correctly
Around line 232, I changed
IS_SC7180_TARGET(c->hw.hwversion))
to
IS_SC7180_TARGET(c->hw.hwversion) ||
IS_SDM845_TARGET(c->hw.hwversion))
But it would seem that only gets us 1/2 way there...
https://dev.gentoo.org/~steev/files/image2.jpg
But should I continue on this path, or should we be finding others who have an N61 and see what their EDID reports?
I have another c630, but unfortunately, it appears to have the IVO screen in it, instead of another N61. I asked another user and he also had the IVO.
-- steev
| |