Messages in this thread | | | From | Christian Gmeiner <> | Date | Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:21:41 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add support for GPU load values |
| |
Hi Lucas,
Am Fr., 10. Juli 2020 um 10:44 Uhr schrieb Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>: > > Hoi Lucas > > Am Fr., 10. Juli 2020 um 10:31 Uhr schrieb Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>: > > > > Hi Christian, > > > > Am Freitag, den 10.07.2020, 09:41 +0200 schrieb Christian Gmeiner: > > > This patch series add support for loadavg values for GPU > > > sub-components. I am adding a SMA algorithm as I was not > > > really sure if EWMA would be a good fit for this use case. > > > > 1 second is a pretty long window in GPU time. Why do you feel that a > > simple moving average is more appropriate than a exponentially > > weighted one here? Note that I haven't given this any thought myself > > and haven't made up my mind yet, so this is a honest question to > > understand the reasoning behind your choice. > > >
I have v2 ready except for this point. If you want to go with EWMA could you provide me with a good weight reciprocal value to use?
-- greets -- Christian Gmeiner, MSc
https://christian-gmeiner.info/privacypolicy
| |