Messages in this thread | | | From | Christian Gmeiner <> | Date | Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:44:47 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add support for GPU load values |
| |
Hoi Lucas
Am Fr., 10. Juli 2020 um 10:31 Uhr schrieb Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>: > > Hi Christian, > > Am Freitag, den 10.07.2020, 09:41 +0200 schrieb Christian Gmeiner: > > This patch series add support for loadavg values for GPU > > sub-components. I am adding a SMA algorithm as I was not > > really sure if EWMA would be a good fit for this use case. > > 1 second is a pretty long window in GPU time. Why do you feel that a > simple moving average is more appropriate than a exponentially > weighted one here? Note that I haven't given this any thought myself > and haven't made up my mind yet, so this is a honest question to > understand the reasoning behind your choice. >
I played with both variants but I 'feel' that SMA might be a better fit. To be honest I have no background in signal processing and stuff like this so.. I will go the route you guide me to :) I have kept the "interface" for SMA equal to the one EWMA uses so I can easily switch between them.
-- greets -- Christian Gmeiner, MSc
https://christian-gmeiner.info/privacypolicy
| |