Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Venus dynamic debug | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Tue, 09 Jun 2020 09:49:30 -0700 |
| |
(adding Jim Cromie and comments)
On Tue, 2020-06-09 at 09:03 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 6/9/20 4:13 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 01:45:57PM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > > > Here is the third version of dynamic debug improvements in Venus > > > driver. As has been suggested on previous version by Joe [1] I've > > > made the relevant changes in dynamic debug core to handle leveling > > > as more generic way and not open-code/workaround it in the driver. > > > > > > About changes: > > > - added change in the dynamic_debug and in documentation > > > - added respective pr_debug_level and dev_dbg_level > > > > Honestly, this seems like you want to use tracepoints, not dynamic debug.
Tracepoints are a bit heavy and do not have any class or grouping mechanism.
debug_class is likely a better name than debug_level
> Also see this patch series: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200605162645.289174-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com/ > [PATCH 00/16] dynamic_debug: cleanups, 2 features > > It adds/expands dynamic debug flags quite a bit.
Yes, and thanks Randy and Jim and Stanimir
I haven't gone through Jim's proposal enough yet. It's unfortunate these patches series conflict.
And for Jim, a link to Stanimir's patch series: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200609104604.1594-1-stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org/
| |