lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] arm-nommu: Add use_reserved_mem() to check if device support reserved memory
From
Date
On 6/9/20 4:43 PM, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 6/9/20 4:36 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 11:22:24PM +0800, dillon min wrote:
>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>>
>>> Thanks for reviewing.
>>>
>>> Hi Christoph Hellwig,
>>>
>>> I just want to know if kernel dma mapping/direct is focused on
>>> platforms with MMU.
>>> leave arch code to handle dma coherent memory management themself for
>>> no-MMU platform.
>>
>> No, I'd really like to consolidate everything that isn't overly
>> arch specific eventually.
>>
>>>
>>> so, you just return error code in kernel/dma/mapping.c,direct.c
>>> without CONFIG_MMU defined ?
>>> which means dma-direct mapping doesn't support !CONFIG_MMU is not a
>>> bug, but design as it's.
>>> or, just return error code currently, will add dma direct mapping
>>> support for !CONFIG_MMU in the
>>> future?
>>>
>>> As Vladimir Murzin's suggestion has changes in kernel code, I need
>>> your input to get
>>> the design goal about dma-direct mapping, thanks.
>>
>> Can someone repost the whole patch?
>>
>
> Happy to repost as separate patch once dillon confirms it actually works.
>
> Meanwhile, I'm trying to understand at which point we lost this
> functionality for NOMMU... maybe it will become different patch :)
>

mmap operation for dma-noop (ancestor of dma-direct) was proposed
in [1]. It was suggested to change dma_common_map() instead which
was implemented in

07c75d7a6b9e ("drivers: dma-mapping: allow dma_common_mmap() for NOMMU")

that removed CONFIG_MMU drom dma_common_mmap(). Later

62fcee9a3bd7 ("dma-mapping: remove CONFIG_ARCH_NO_COHERENT_DMA_MMAP")

reintroduced CONFIG_MMU in dma_common_mmap().

Even though commit mentions ARM, I do not see how mmap would continue
to work for NOMMU with dma-direct. ARM NOMMU needs it's own DMA operations
only in cases where caches are implemented or active, in other cases it
fully relies on dma-direct.

It looks to me that we either should provide NOMMU variant for mmap in
dma/direct or (carefully) fix dma/mapping.

Thoughts?

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-January/480600.html

Vladimir

> Cheers
> Vladimir
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-09 18:25    [W:0.062 / U:0.520 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site