lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] sched/uclamp: Add a new sysctl to control RT default boost value
On 06/04/20 14:14, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> I have tried your patch and I don't see any difference compared to
> previous tests. Let me give you more details of my setup:
> I create 3 levels of cgroups and usually run the tests in the 4 levels
> (which includes root). The result above are for the root level
>
> But I see a difference at other levels:
>
> root level 1 level 2 level 3
>
> /w patch uclamp disable 50097 46615 43806 41078
> tip uclamp enable 48706(-2.78%) 45583(-2.21%) 42851(-2.18%)
> 40313(-1.86%)
> /w patch uclamp enable 48882(-2.43%) 45774(-1.80%) 43108(-1.59%)
> 40667(-1.00%)
>
> Whereas tip with uclamp stays around 2% behind tip without uclamp, the
> diff of uclamp with your patch tends to decrease when we increase the
> number of level

Thanks for the extra info. Let me try this.

If you can run perf and verify that you see activate/deactivate_task showing up
as overhead I'd appreciate it. Just to confirm that indeed what we're seeing
here are symptoms of the same problem Mel is seeing.

> Beside this, that's also interesting to notice the ~6% of perf impact
> between each level for the same image

Interesting indeed.

Thanks

--
Qais Yousef

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-05 12:45    [W:0.465 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site