lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/ERR: Fix fatal error recovery for non-hotplug capable devices
Date
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote:

>From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
>
>Fatal (DPC) error recovery is currently broken for non-hotplug
>capable devices. With current implementation, after successful
>fatal error recovery, non-hotplug capable device state won't be
>restored properly. You can find related issues in following links.
>
>https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/27/290
>https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/12115.1588207324@famine/
>https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/28/328
>
>Current fatal error recovery implementation relies on hotplug handler
>for detaching/re-enumerating the affected devices/drivers on DLLSC
>state changes. So when dealing with non-hotplug capable devices,
>recovery code does not restore the state of the affected devices
>correctly. Correct implementation should call report_slot_reset()
>function after resetting the link to restore the state of the
>device/driver.
>
>So use PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET as error status for successful
>reset_link() operation and use PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT for failure
>case. PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET error state will ensure slot_reset()
>is called after reset link operation which will also fix the above
>mentioned issue.
>
>[original patch is from jay.vosburgh@canonical.com]
>[original patch link https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/12115.1588207324@famine/]
>Fixes: 6d2c89441571 ("PCI/ERR: Update error status after reset_link()")
>Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
>Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

I've tested this patch set on one of our test machines, and it
resolves the issue. I plan to test with other systems tomorrow.

-J

>---
> drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>index 14bb8f54723e..5fe8561c7185 100644
>--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
>@@ -165,8 +165,28 @@ pci_ers_result_t pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev,
> pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast error_detected message\n");
> if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
> pci_walk_bus(bus, report_frozen_detected, &status);
>- status = reset_link(dev);
>- if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
>+ /*
>+ * After resetting the link using reset_link() call, the
>+ * possible value of error status is either
>+ * PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT (failure case) or
>+ * PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET (success case).
>+ * So ignore the return value of report_error_detected()
>+ * call for fatal errors. Instead use
>+ * PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET as initial status value.
>+ *
>+ * Ignoring the status return value of report_error_detected()
>+ * call will also help in case of EDR mode based error
>+ * recovery. In EDR mode AER and DPC Capabilities are owned by
>+ * firmware and hence report_error_detected() call will possibly
>+ * return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NO_AER_DRIVER. So if we don't ignore
>+ * the return value of report_error_detected() then
>+ * pcie_do_recovery() would report incorrect status after
>+ * successful recovery. Ignoring PCI_ERS_RESULT_NO_AER_DRIVER
>+ * in non EDR case should not have any functional impact.
>+ */
>+ status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET;
>+ if (reset_link(dev) != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED) {
>+ status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
> pci_warn(dev, "link reset failed\n");
> goto failed;
> }
>--
>2.17.1
>

---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-05 06:49    [W:0.061 / U:0.248 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site