lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: fix pm_runtime_get_sync failure
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:45 PM Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/06/2020 19:41, Navid Emamdoost wrote:
> > Calling pm_runtime_get_sync increments the counter even in case of
> > failure, causing incorrect ref count. Call pm_runtime_put if
> > pm_runtime_get_sync fails.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
> > index c4ce5dfb149b..e8c749cd3fe8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
> > @@ -659,6 +659,7 @@ static int tegra_adma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dc)
> > ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(tdc2dev(tdc));
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > free_irq(tdc->irq, tdc);
> > + pm_runtime_put(tdc2dev(tdc));
> > return ret;
> > }
>
>
> Please do not send two patches with the same $subject that are fixing
> two different areas of the driver. In fact, please squash these two
> patches into a single fix and resend because they are fixing the same issue.

Sure, I will prepare a version 2 with your suggestions.

>
> Jon
>
> --
> nvpublic



--
Navid.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-04 19:48    [W:0.036 / U:0.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site