Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add GC_URGENT_LOW mode in gc_urgent | From | Chao Yu <> | Date | Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:35:45 +0800 |
| |
On 2020/6/30 8:54, Daeho Jeong wrote: > From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> > > Added a new gc_urgent mode, GC_URGENT_LOW, in which mode > F2FS will lower the bar of checking idle in order to > process outstanding discard commands and GC a little bit > aggressively. > > Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> > --- > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs | 4 +++- > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 10 ++++++++-- > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 6 +++--- > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 4 ++-- > fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 6 ++++-- > 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs > index 4bb93a06d8ab..7f730c4c8df2 100644 > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs > @@ -229,7 +229,9 @@ Date: August 2017 > Contact: "Jaegeuk Kim" <jaegeuk@kernel.org> > Description: Do background GC agressively when set. When gc_urgent = 1, > background thread starts to do GC by given gc_urgent_sleep_time > - interval. It is set to 0 by default. > + interval. When gc_urgent = 2, F2FS will lower the bar of > + checking idle in order to process outstanding discard commands > + and GC a little bit aggressively. It is set to 0 by default. > > What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/gc_urgent_sleep_time > Date: August 2017 > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > index e6e47618a357..4b28fd42fdbc 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > @@ -1283,7 +1283,8 @@ enum { > GC_NORMAL, > GC_IDLE_CB, > GC_IDLE_GREEDY, > - GC_URGENT, > + GC_URGENT_HIGH, > + GC_URGENT_LOW, > }; > > enum { > @@ -1540,6 +1541,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info { > unsigned int cur_victim_sec; /* current victim section num */ > unsigned int gc_mode; /* current GC state */ > unsigned int next_victim_seg[2]; /* next segment in victim section */ > + > /* for skip statistic */ > unsigned int atomic_files; /* # of opened atomic file */ > unsigned long long skipped_atomic_files[2]; /* FG_GC and BG_GC */ > @@ -2480,7 +2482,7 @@ static inline void *f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cachep, > > static inline bool is_idle(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type) > { > - if (sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT) > + if (sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_HIGH) > return true; > > if (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_RD_DATA) || get_pages(sbi, F2FS_RD_NODE) || > @@ -2498,6 +2500,10 @@ static inline bool is_idle(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type) > atomic_read(&SM_I(sbi)->fcc_info->queued_flush)) > return false; > > + if (sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_LOW && > + (type == DISCARD_TIME || type == GC_TIME)) > + return true; > + > return f2fs_time_over(sbi, type); > } > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > index 6eec3b2d606d..3b718da69910 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static int gc_thread_func(void *data) > * invalidated soon after by user update or deletion. > * So, I'd like to wait some time to collect dirty segments. > */ > - if (sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT) { > + if (sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_HIGH) { > wait_ms = gc_th->urgent_sleep_time; > down_write(&sbi->gc_lock); > goto do_gc; > @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static int select_gc_type(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int gc_type) > gc_mode = GC_CB; > break; > case GC_IDLE_GREEDY: > - case GC_URGENT: > + case GC_URGENT_HIGH: > gc_mode = GC_GREEDY; > break; > } > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void select_policy(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int gc_type, > * foreground GC and urgent GC cases. > */ > if (gc_type != FG_GC && > - (sbi->gc_mode != GC_URGENT) && > + (sbi->gc_mode != GC_URGENT_HIGH) && > p->max_search > sbi->max_victim_search) > p->max_search = sbi->max_victim_search; > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > index b45e473508a9..5924b3965ae4 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ bool f2fs_need_SSR(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > if (f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi)) > return false; > - if (sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT) > + if (sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_HIGH) > return true; > if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) > return true; > @@ -1759,7 +1759,7 @@ static int issue_discard_thread(void *data) > continue; > } > > - if (sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT) > + if (sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_HIGH) > __init_discard_policy(sbi, &dpolicy, DPOLICY_FORCE, 1); > > sb_start_intwrite(sbi->sb); > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > index e877c59b9fdb..ab40e1f89f23 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c > @@ -350,14 +350,16 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a, > return -EINVAL; > > if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "gc_urgent")) { > - if (t >= 1) { > - sbi->gc_mode = GC_URGENT; > + if (t == 1) { > + sbi->gc_mode = GC_URGENT_HIGH; > if (sbi->gc_thread) { > sbi->gc_thread->gc_wake = 1; > wake_up_interruptible_all( > &sbi->gc_thread->gc_wait_queue_head); > wake_up_discard_thread(sbi, true); > } > + } else if (t == 2) { > + sbi->gc_mode = GC_URGENT_LOW; > } else { > sbi->gc_mode = GC_NORMAL;
As functionality description in sysfs doc, shouldn't it be:
if (t == 0) { sbi->gc_mode = GC_NORMAL; } else if (t == 1) { sbi->gc_mode = GC_URGENT_HIGH; ... } else if (t == 2) { sbi->gc_mode = GC_URGENT_LOW; } else { return -EINVAL; } return count;
> } >
| |