Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Xin Hao <> | Subject | [PATCH v2] cpufreq: CPPC: fix some unreasonable codes in cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz() | Date | Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:26:10 +0800 |
| |
The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get 'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use 'caps->highest_perf' instead.
Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index 257d726a4456..444ee76a6bae 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu, if (!max_khz) max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz(); mul = max_khz; - div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf; + div = caps->highest_perf; } return (u64)perf * mul / div; } -- 2.24.1
| |