lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patches in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] sched/uclamp: Add a new sysctl to control RT default boost value
On 06/03/20 16:59, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> When I want to stress the fast path i usually use "perf bench sched pipe -T "
> The tip/sched/core on my arm octo core gives the following results for
> 20 iterations of perf bench sched pipe -T -l 50000
>
> all uclamp config disabled 50035.4(+/- 0.334%)
> all uclamp config enabled 48749.8(+/- 0.339%) -2.64%
>
> It's quite easy to reproduce and probably easier to study the impact

Thanks Vincent. This is very useful!

I could reproduce that on my Juno.

One of the codepath I was suspecting seems to affect it.



diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0464569f26a7..9f48090eb926 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1063,10 +1063,12 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec_id(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
* e.g. due to future modification, warn and fixup the expected value.
*/
SCHED_WARN_ON(bucket->value > rq_clamp);
+#if 0
if (bucket->value >= rq_clamp) {
bkt_clamp = uclamp_rq_max_value(rq, clamp_id, uc_se->value);
WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, bkt_clamp);
}
+#endif
}

static inline void uclamp_rq_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)


uclamp_rq_max_value() could be expensive as it loops over all buckets.
Commenting this whole path out strangely doesn't just 'fix' it, but produces
better results to no-uclamp kernel :-/



# ./perf bench -r 20 sched pipe -T -l 50000
Without uclamp: 5039
With uclamp: 4832
With uclamp+patch: 5729


It might be because schedutil gets biased differently by uclamp..? If I move to
performance governor these numbers almost double.

I don't know. But this promoted me to look closer and I think I spotted a bug
where in the if condition we check for '>=' instead of '>', causing us to take
the supposedly impossible fail safe path.

Mind trying with the below patch please?



diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0464569f26a7..50d66d4016ff 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec_id(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
* e.g. due to future modification, warn and fixup the expected value.
*/
SCHED_WARN_ON(bucket->value > rq_clamp);
- if (bucket->value >= rq_clamp) {
+ if (bucket->value > rq_clamp) {
bkt_clamp = uclamp_rq_max_value(rq, clamp_id, uc_se->value);
WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, bkt_clamp);
}


Thanks

--
Qais Yousef

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-03 18:53    [W:0.131 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site