lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH glibc 1/3] glibc: Perform rseq registration at C startup and thread creation (v20)
----- On Jun 3, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com wrote:

> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>
>> +#ifdef __cplusplus
>> +# if __cplusplus >= 201103L
>> +# define __rseq_static_assert(expr, diagnostic) static_assert (expr,
>> diagnostic)
>> +# define __rseq_alignof(type) alignof (type)
>> +# define __rseq_alignas(x) alignas (x)
>> +# define __rseq_tls_storage_class thread_local
>> +# endif
>> +#elif (defined __STDC_VERSION__ ? __STDC_VERSION__ : 0) >= 201112L
>> +# define __rseq_static_assert(expr, diagnostic) _Static_assert (expr,
>> diagnostic)
>> +# define __rseq_alignof(type) _Alignof (type)
>> +# define __rseq_alignas(x) _Alignas (x)
>> +# define __rseq_tls_storage_class _Thread_local
>> +#endif
>
> This does not seem to work. I get this with GCC 9:
>
> In file included from /tmp/cih_test_gsrKbC.cc:8:0:
> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sys/rseq.h:42:50: error: attribute ignored
> [-Werror=attributes]
> # define __rseq_alignas(x) alignas (x)
> ^
> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sys/rseq.h:122:14: note: in expansion of macro
> ‘__rseq_alignas’
> uint32_t __rseq_alignas (32) version;
> ^

Is that when compiling C or C++ code ? If it's C code, I would expect
"_Alignas" to be used, not "alignas".

Which exact version of gcc do you use ?

>
> In any case, these changes really have to go into the UAPI header first.
> Only the __thread handling should remain. Otherwise, we'll have a tough
> situation on our hands changing the UAPI header, without introducing
> macro definition conflicts. I'd suggest to stick to the aligned
> attribute for the time being, like the current UAPI headers.

OK. Should I do that in a separate patch, or you do it on top of my patchset,
or should I re-spin another round of the series ?
>
> The resut looks okay to me.
>
> I'm still waiting for feedback from other maintainers whether the level
> of documentation and testing is appropriate.

OK.

Thanks,

Mathieu

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-03 14:23    [W:0.292 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site