lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove cmpxchg() in arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist()
From
Date
On 23/06/2020 14:55, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> Den tis 23 juni 2020 12:21John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com
> <mailto:john.garry@huawei.com>> skrev:
>
> On 23/06/2020 10:35, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> >
> >     I'd say that GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK() should be able to handle a
> l=0 and
> >     h=unsigned value, so I doubt this warn.
> >
> >     Using GENMASK((int)cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift, 0) resolves it,
> but it
> >     looks
> >     like GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK() could be improved.
> >
> >
> > Indeed it could, it is fixed in -next.
>
> ok, thanks for the pointer, but I still see this on today's -next with
> this patch:
>
> make W=1 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.o
>
>
> Oh, ok thanks for reporting. I guess different gcc versions have
> different behaviour. I guess we'll have to change the comparison to
> (!((h) == (l) || (h) > (l))) instead (not sure I got all parenthesis and
> logic correct but you get the idea).
>

Yeah, so this looks to fix it:

--- a/include/linux/bits.h
+++ b/include/linux/bits.h
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@
#include <linux/build_bug.h>
#define GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) \
(BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(__builtin_choose_expr( \
- __builtin_constant_p((l) > (h)), (l) > (h), 0)))
+ __builtin_constant_p(!((h) == (l) ||(h) > (l))), !((h)
== (l) ||(h) > (l)), 0)))
+

We may be able to just use (h) == (l) as the const expr to make it more
concise, but that may be confusing.

I only tested with my toolchain based on 7.5.0

Thanks,
John

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-26 12:07    [W:0.099 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site