Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:03:30 -0400 (EDT) | From | Mathieu Desnoyers <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] ring-buffer: Have nested events still record running time stamp |
| |
----- On Jun 25, 2020, at 3:09 PM, rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 13:55:07 -0400 (EDT) > Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote: > >> What are the types used for before_stamp and write_stamp ? If those >> are 64-bit integers, how does sharing them between nested contexts >> work on 32-bit architectures ? > > BTW, I forgot to state in either of my two emails, THANK YOU! > > I really appreciate the thorough review of this patch, and I welcome > the challenges you give me to make sure I can verify all that I claim > can happen.
You're welcome! I believe these discussions we've been having for the past 10+ years on ring buffer design have helped improve our respective projects.
I'm glad to be of service!
Thanks,
Mathieu
-- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
| |