lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kernel/trace: Add TRACING_ALLOW_PRINTK config option
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 04:45:24PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> trace_printk is only meant as a debugging tool, and should never be
> compiled into production code without source code changes, as
> indicated by the warning that shows up on boot if any trace_printk
> is called:
> ** NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE **
> ** **
> ** trace_printk() being used. Allocating extra memory. **
> ** **
> ** This means that this is a DEBUG kernel and it is **
> ** unsafe for production use. **
>
> If this option is set to n, the kernel will generate a build-time
> error if trace_printk is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
> include/linux/kernel.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/trace/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> index 196607aaf653082..b6addc6ba669e85 100644
> +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -721,10 +721,15 @@ do { \
> #define trace_printk(fmt, ...) \
> do { \
> char _______STR[] = __stringify((__VA_ARGS__)); \
> + \
> + __static_assert( \
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRACING_ALLOW_PRINTK),\
> + "trace_printk called, please enable CONFIG_TRACING_ALLOW_PRINTK."); \
> + \

Why __static_assert not normal static_assert?

Jason

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-24 15:57    [W:0.122 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site