lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH drivers/misc 0/4] lkdtm: Various clean ups
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:29 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/24/20 1:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 09:23:25AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>>> Regardless, it seems arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h is not needed any more?
> >>>
> >>>> True that, we can rip the file.
> >>>
> >>> Has anyone fixed the uml build errors?
> >>
> >> I didn't realize that this is a super urgent issue. ;-)
> >>
> >> Kees, if you want you can carry a patch in your series, I'll ack it.
> >> Otherwise I can also do a patch and bring it via the uml tree upstream
> >> as soon more fixes queued up.
> >
> > I think the lkdtm change will tweak this bug, so I'm happy to carry the
> > patch (I just haven't had time to create and test one). Is it really
> > just as simple as removing arch/x86/um/asm/desc.h?
> >
>
> I just tried that and the build is still failing, so No, it's not that simple.
>
> But thanks for offering.
>
> I'll just ignore the UML build errors for now.

This is a allyesconfig?
I just gave CONFIG_LKDTM=y a try, builds fine here.

But the desc.h in uml is still in vain and can be deleted AFAICT.

--
Thanks,
//richard

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-25 00:02    [W:0.051 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site