lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
From
Date
> Your updates were not improvements.

I find your view interesting.

Do you refer to a specific wording suggestion here?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/26028f50-3fb8-eb08-3c9f-08ada018bf9e@web.de/
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/2/210

You pointed another programming alternative out.
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/comment/1447149/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20200602095411.GB5684@sirena.org.uk/


> The formatting was worse

Do you prefer an other quotation style for function names?


> and to my native speaker eyes the grammar was worse.

I am curious if a more pleasing wording variant will be found.


> With this sort of stylistic thing it's especially important
> that any review aligns with the needs and practices of the subsystem,

Such an expectation is reasonable to some degree.


> there is opinion in there and multiple opinions just makes things harder
> for submitters.

Do any of such views deviate from the Linux development documentation?

Regards,
Markus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-02 21:55    [W:0.075 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site