Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:33:46 -0400 | From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/59] 4.9.226-rc2 review |
| |
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 08:37:26AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >On 6/2/20 3:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.226 release. >> There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Thu, 04 Jun 2020 10:16:52 +0000. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> > >Many arm builds still fail as attached. Is it really only me seeing this problem ? > >FWIW, if we need/want to use unified assembler in v4.9.y, shouldn't all unified >assembler patches be applied ?
We don't - I took 71f8af111010 as a dependency rather than on its own merit.
>$ git log --oneline v4.9..c001899a5d6 arch/arm | grep unified >c001899a5d6c ARM: 8843/1: use unified assembler in headers >a216376add73 ARM: 8841/1: use unified assembler in macros >eb7ff9023e4f ARM: 8829/1: spinlock: use unified assembler language syntax >32fdb046ac43 ARM: 8828/1: uaccess: use unified assembler language syntax >1293c2b5d790 ARM: dts: berlin2q: add "cache-unified" to l2 node >75fea300d73a ARM: 8723/2: always assume the "unified" syntax for assembly code > >I am quite concerned especially about missing commit 75fea300d73a, >which removes the ARM_ASM_UNIFIED configuration option. That means it is >still present in v4.9.y, but the failing builds don't enable it. Given that, >the build failures don't seem to be surprising.
I'm just going to drop this series from 4.9 for now, until we can figure out how to do it right.
-- Thanks, Sasha
| |