lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/10] spi: Adding support for Microchip Sparx5 SoC
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 10:18:28AM +0200, Lars Povlsen wrote:
>
> Serge Semin writes:
>
> > Hello Lars,
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:00:21PM +0200, Lars Povlsen wrote:
> >> This is an add-on series to the main SoC Sparx5 series
> >> (Message-ID: <20200513125532.24585-1-lars.povlsen@microchip.com>).
> >>
> >> The series add support for Sparx5 on top of the existing
> >> ocelot/jaguar2 spi driver.
> >>
> >> It spins off the existing support for the MSCC platforms into a
> >> separate driver, as adding new platforms from the MSCC/Microchip
> >> product lines will further complicate (clutter) the original driver.
> >>
> >> New YAML dt-bindings are provided for the resulting driver.
> >>
> >> It is expected that the DT patches are to be taken directly by the arm-soc
> >> maintainers.
> >
> > Regarding our cooperation. It can be implemented as follows. Since your patchset
> > is less cumbersome than mine and is more ready to be integrated into the generic DW
> > APB SSI code, it would be better to first make it through Mark', Andy' and my reviews
> > to be further merged into the kernel version of the driver. After that I'll have
> > my code altered so it could be applied on top of your patches. When everything
> > is done we'll have a more comprehensive DW APB SSI driver with poll-based
> > PIO operations support, new features like rx-delay, etc.
> >
>

> Hi Serge!
>
> I think I would be able to work on the SPI patches this week. Should I
> base it on the current spi-next or 5.7? Then address the comments and
> send out a new revision?

Finally I've done a part of review. It must be enough for v2. As Mark said the
new version is supposed to be based on the spi-next, since that branch's got
all recent DW APB SSI patches applied.

-Sergey

>
> Thanks for reaching out.
>
> ---Lars
>
> > Thank you one more time for the series you've shared with us. Let's see what can
> > be done to improve it...
> >
> > -Sergey
> >
> >>
> >> Lars Povlsen (10):
> >> spi: dw: Add support for polled operation via no IRQ specified in DT
> >> spi: dw: Add support for RX sample delay register
> >> spi: dw: Add support for client driver memory operations
> >> dt-bindings: spi: Add bindings for spi-dw-mchp
> >> spi: spi-dw-mmio: Spin off MSCC platforms into spi-dw-mchp
> >> dt-bindings: spi: spi-dw-mchp: Add Sparx5 support
> >> spi: spi-dw-mchp: Add Sparx5 support
> >> arm64: dts: sparx5: Add SPI controller
> >> arm64: dts: sparx5: Add spi-nor support
> >> arm64: dts: sparx5: Add spi-nand devices
> >>
> >> .../bindings/spi/mscc,ocelot-spi.yaml | 89 ++++
> >> .../bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.txt | 7 +-
> >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/sparx5.dtsi | 37 ++
> >> .../boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb125.dts | 16 +
> >> .../boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb134.dts | 22 +
> >> .../dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb134_board.dtsi | 9 +
> >> .../boot/dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135.dts | 23 +
> >> .../dts/microchip/sparx5_pcb135_board.dtsi | 9 +
> >> arch/mips/configs/generic/board-ocelot.config | 2 +-
> >> drivers/spi/Kconfig | 7 +
> >> drivers/spi/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/spi/spi-dw-mchp.c | 399 ++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c | 93 ----
> >> drivers/spi/spi-dw.c | 31 +-
> >> drivers/spi/spi-dw.h | 4 +
> >> 16 files changed, 644 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mscc,ocelot-spi.yaml
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/spi/spi-dw-mchp.c
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.26.2
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> >> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
> --
> Lars Povlsen,
> Microchip

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-03 01:45    [W:0.078 / U:0.912 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site