lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: misc: add array_size_dup script to detect missed overflow checks
From
Date
> Where is the typo?

I tried to point a possible replacement out for the word “overlow” by “overflow”.


> I can't handle your suggestions

I hope that you got chances to take also my patch review comments into account.


> because your mails constantly break the threads. I just can't find them
> after due to missed/wrong In-Reply-To headers.

There are some factors involved for this undesirable effect.

* My software selection contains open issues in the handling of mail links
according to the communication interface “public inbox”.

* Mailing list settings hinder more direct participation (for me).

* If you would specify more mail addresses for reviewers (like me) explicitly
as recipients, the impression can hopefully become more positive again.


>>> +expression subE1 <= as.E1;
>>> +expression subE2 <= as.E2;
>>> +expression as.E1, as.E2, E3;
>>
>> How do you think about to use the following SmPL code variant?
>>
>> expression subE1 <= as.E1, subE2 <= as.E2, as.E1, as.E2, E3;
>
> It's less readable and harder to review.

Can a different code formatting help then?

expression subE1 <= as.E1, subE2 <= as.E2,
as.E1, as.E2, E3;


>> I suggest to move the ampersand before the disjunction in such
>> SmPL code exclusion specifications.
>>
>> + when != & \(E1 \| E2 \| subE1 \| subE2\)
>
> Ok, I will fix this if there will be next version.

Other software extensions which you proposed recently were similarly affected
at a few places.


>> I would prefer an other code formatting at such places.
>>
>> +coccilib.report.print_report(p2[0],
>> + f"WARNING: array_size is already used (line {p1[0].line}) to compute the same size.")
>
> No. It's pointless to break the line to save 5 chars this way.

Did we get used to function parameter alignment?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=1b5044021070efa3259f3e9548dc35d1eb6aa844#n93

I suggest to reconsider potential concerns for line length limitations
according to such message strings.

Regards,
Markus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-18 17:04    [W:0.050 / U:1.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site