Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] s390: fix build error for sys_call_table_emu | From | Xiaoming Ni <> | Date | Thu, 18 Jun 2020 21:49:21 +0800 |
| |
On 2020/6/18 19:27, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 07:03:20PM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote: >> Build error on s390: >> arch/s390/kernel/entry.o: in function `sys_call_table_emu': >> >> (.rodata+0x1288): undefined reference to `__s390_' >> >> In commit ("All arch: remove system call sys_sysctl") >> 148 common fdatasync sys_fdatasync sys_fdatasync >> -149 common _sysctl sys_sysctl compat_sys_sysctl >> +149 common _sysctl sys_ni_syscall >> 150 common mlock sys_mlock sys_mlock >> >> After the patch is integrated, there is a format error in the generated >> arch/s390/include/generated/asm/syscall_table.h: >> SYSCALL(sys_fdatasync, sys_fdatasync) >> SYSCALL(sys_ni_syscall,) /* cause build error */ >> SYSCALL(sys_mlock,sys_mlock) >> >> There are holes in the system call number in >> arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl. When generating syscall_table.h, >> these hole numbers will be automatically filled with "NI_SYSCALL". >> Therefore, delete the number 149 to fix the current compilation failure. >> Similarly, modify tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl. >> >> Fixes: ("All arch: remove system call sys_sysctl") >> Fixes: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200616030734.87257-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com/ >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com> >> --- >> arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 - >> tools/perf/arch/s390/entry/syscalls/syscall.tbl | 1 - >> 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl b/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl >> index f17aaf6fe5de..bcaf93994e3c 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl >> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl >> @@ -138,7 +138,6 @@ >> 146 common writev sys_writev compat_sys_writev >> 147 common getsid sys_getsid sys_getsid >> 148 common fdatasync sys_fdatasync sys_fdatasync >> -149 common _sysctl sys_ni_syscall > > This is not correct. It should be changed to: > > 149 common _sysctl - - > thanks for your guidance
> Otherwise the generated __NR__sysctl define will be lost from > unistd.h, which should not happen. Looking at the link above it > _looks_ like a similar mistake was done for arm64. > Using holes will cause the definition of __NR__sysctl to be missing in include/asm/unistd_32.h and include/asm/unistd_64.h
For arm64, I observed that "sys_afs_syscall", "sys_get_kernel_syms" and other commented out syscalls have no corresponding definition _NR_XXX in unistd.h, is it not a problem on arm64?
/* 127 was sys_create_module */ __SYSCALL(127, sys_ni_syscall)
/* 130 was sys_get_kernel_syms */ __SYSCALL(130, sys_ni_syscall)
/* 137 was sys_afs_syscall */ __SYSCALL(137, sys_ni_syscall)
Thanks Xiaoming Ni
| |