lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Potential Spoof] [PATCH v2 0/5] mm: memcg accounting of percpu memory
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:39:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:19:01 -0700 Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > This version is based on top of v6 of the new slab controller
> > > patchset. The following patches are actually required by this series:
> > > mm: memcg: factor out memcg- and lruvec-level changes out of __mod_lruvec_state()
> > > mm: memcg: prepare for byte-sized vmstat items
> > > mm: memcg: convert vmstat slab counters to bytes
> > > mm: slub: implement SLUB version of obj_to_index()
> > > mm: memcontrol: decouple reference counting from page accounting
> > > mm: memcg/slab: obj_cgroup API
> >
> > Hello, Andrew!
> >
> > How this patchset should be routed: through the mm or percpu tree?
> >
> > It has been acked by Dennis (the percpu maintainer), but it does depend
> > on first several patches from the slab controller rework patchset.
>
> I can grab both.

Perfect, thanks!

>
> > The slab controller rework is ready to be merged: as in v6 most patches
> > in the series were acked by Johannes and/or Vlastimil and no questions
> > or concerns were raised after v6.
> >
> > Please, let me know if you want me to resend both patchsets.
>
> There was quite a bit of valuable discussion in response to [0/n] which
> really should have been in the changelog[s] from day one.
> slab-vs-slub, performance testing, etc.
>
> So, umm, I'll take a look at both series now but I do think an enhanced
> [0/n] description is warranted?
>

Yes, I'm running suggested tests right now, and will update on the results.

Thanks!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-17 22:47    [W:0.043 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site