Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:18:10 +1000 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Explicitly include linux/major.h where it is needed |
| |
Hi Greg,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 07:58:43 +0200 Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:27:47AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > This is in preparation for removing the include of major.h where it is > > not needed. > > > > These files were found using > > > > grep -E -L '[<"](uapi/)?linux/major\.h' $(git grep -l -w -f /tmp/xx) > > > > where /tmp/xx contains all the symbols defined in major.h. There were > > a couple of files in that list that did not need the include since the > > references are in comments. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > > Any reason this had an RFC, but patch 2/2 did not?
I forgot :-) I added RFC just to hopefully get some attention as this is just the start of a long slow use of my "spare" time.
> They look good to me, I will be glad to take these, but do you still > want reviews from others for this? It seems simple enough to me...
Yeah, well, we all know the simplest patches usually cause the most pain :-)
However, I have been fairly careful and it is an easy include file to work with. And I have done my usual build checks, so the linux-next maintainer won't complain about build problems :-)
I would like to hear from Arnd, at least, as I don't want to step on his toes (he is having a larger look at our include files). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |