lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[RFC PATCH 0/2] MTE support for KVM guest
Date
These patches add support to KVM to enable MTE within a guest. It is
based on Catalin's v4 MTE user space series[1].

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200515171612.1020-1-catalin.marinas%40arm.com

Posting as an RFC as I'd like feedback on the approach taken. First a
little background on how MTE fits within the architecture:

The stage 2 page tables have limited scope for controlling the
availability of MTE. If a page is mapped as Normal and cached in stage 2
then it's the stage 1 tables that get to choose whether the memory is
tagged or not. So the only way of forbidding tags on a page from the
hypervisor is to change the cacheability (or make it device memory)
which would cause other problems. Note this restriction fits the
intention that a system should have all (general purpose) memory
supporting tags if it support MTE, so it's not too surprising.

However, the upshot of this is that to enable MTE within a guest all
pages of memory mapped into the guest as normal cached pages in stage 2
*must* support MTE (i.e. we must ensure the tags are appropriately
sanitised and save/restore the tags during swap etc).

My current approach is that KVM transparently upgrades any pages
provided by the VMM to be tag-enabled when they are faulted in (i.e.
sets the PG_mte_tagged flag on the page) which has the benefit of
requiring fewer changes in the VMM. However, save/restore of the VM
state still requires the VMM to have a PROT_MTE enabled mapping so that
it can access the tag values. A VMM which 'forgets' to enable PROT_MTE
would lose the tag values when saving/restoring (tags are RAZ/WI when
PROT_MTE isn't set).

An alternative approach would be to enforce the VMM provides PROT_MTE
memory in the first place. This seems appealing to prevent the above
potentially unexpected gotchas with save/restore, however this would
also extend to memory that you might not expect to have PROT_MTE (e.g. a
shared frame buffer for an emulated graphics card).

Comments on the approach (or ideas for alternative approaches) are very
welcome.

Steven Price (2):
arm64: kvm: Save/restore MTE registers
arm64: kvm: Introduce MTE VCPU feature

arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 3 +++
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 9 ++++++++-
arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c | 12 ++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 8 ++++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++++++
virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 11 +++++++++++
7 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
2.20.1

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-17 14:41    [W:0.166 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site